If I have the questions correctly, in terms of the auto plant, definitely.
We're talking about the federal sector, and I've heard the comments made. I'll reiterate what I said earlier, which was that the federal sector is not like any other sector in Canada in terms of labour jurisdiction. It's the backbone of Canada, across all provinces. So the auto plant...and that's part of the issue here: we're talking about the federal sector. If something grinds down the federal sector with respect to the key services provided by federal sector employers, the auto plant stops having trucks coming to its door, the railroad can't deliver, so it grinds that plant down. And it's not a party to the dispute. In fact, it's in a different jurisdiction, in terms of labour relations. There's definitely an impact on virtually every business in Canada from labour disputes.
I'd like to also make a comment that the examples we're using, some of the examples that are being brought up, are not applicable to the federal sector. The comments have been made that we've had relative labour peace. Every employer and union goes through cycles, there's no question about that. But the federal sector labour relations are seen by most jurisdictions in Canada and internationally as extremely positive. That's the federal sector.
So in terms of investment decisions, labour issues do factor in. That would be part of the consideration, no question. I'm sure it is a consideration. It was talked about in terms of the submission, I believe, from B.C., so I assume it is. I'm not privy to that.
In terms of the balance that's achieved—