Parliament always has the ability to do that, or the right, and that's something we debate very closely. But the point here is that I think we're hearing again and again that there's no provision whereby essential services can be determined.
Certainly a strike has an impact. We all accept that. A strike has an impact both on workers who are on strike and their families, on the local community, and certainly on the employer, the company, the services, and the public. But the point here is—and I really want your agreement—that there is a provision whereby essential services....
It may not go as far as you want. Your job as the employer is to argue that, right? It's to say that “essential services” to you means X, Y, and Z. You go before the board and the union goes before the board, and you each make your case. But that provision does exist. That process exists. But I think there's some suggestion here that somehow it doesn't exist, when it does.