Let me ask this question, relative to what Ms. Dhalla was asking about.
I want a law that bans replacement workers, but I don't want it if it's going to mean a shutdown of essential services or if it is entirely punitive to companies using employees who are not members of the bargaining unit to do the work. She asked you about somebody doing work in another area or establishment. Specifically, if Aliant has a strike in Atlantic Canada, under this legislation, would it be your view that they could use a manager in Saint John to work in a call centre in Moncton?