I want to point out that while we are discussing the first motion, I thought it would be important, as part of the debate, to articulate what the second motion was going to be. They go in conjunction with each other. My understanding is that because of the reference to Standing Order 97.1, we can't blend the two as one motion. They need to be two separate motions.
In terms of the communication and Mr. Lessard's concerns, we are dealing with the first motion. I want it to be debated in the context of an additional second motion to come.