I totally agree with that. In fact, that was my second point. The board has all the jurisdiction it needs to define essential services in the context of the current replacement workers legislation. The fact that the code has given authority to the parties to determine what essential services effectively are means you don't really need a huge law or huge intervention from the board. Once you change the replacement workers legislation, then that balance I was talking about, the ability of the board to come to a decision, comes into question.
On February 13th, 2007. See this statement in context.