There are about seven people.
Taking a look at the bill itself, Bill C-257, and going on to proposed paragraph 94(2.2)(a), I've had a number people come forward with a concern in regard to where it states “a person employed as a manager, superintendent or foreman or as a representative of the employer in employer-employee relations”, in that they are the only individuals who would be allowed to work during a particular lockout or strike. Would this actually prevent individuals who are non-unionized employees, who are managers, to go in and provide replacement services?