The point I'm trying to make in brief is that we've had numerous discussions around this committee table as to whether or not essential services are protected, and I think this legal opinion and your comments make it clear that they are not necessarily protected. In the one instance in which the CIRB ruled against Aliant Telecom, there were people who had cellphone service with this company and who could not call 911 and could not call the fire department or the police department while this strike was going on. In fact the CIRB upheld the fact that they wouldn't be allowed to. So there's a prime example of essential services being prevented from occurring, and I hope that it addresses the concerns that have been raised around this table.
