The amendment is correct; it has just been applied to the wrong clause in the bill. That presents a problem. If we move over clause 1 and let it stand as it is in the bill, then when we move to clause 2, the next clause in the bill, there is exactly the same amendment from Mr. Silva but it will apply to clause 2, not to clause 1.
On February 14th, 2007. See this statement in context.