Mr. Chair, for clarification purposes, if you really look at where my motion begins, “During a strike or lockout”, it is exactly the same language as in proposed subsection 94(2.1). We're not dealing with the first section. I don't know how that got misnumbered, but all the language is the same as proposed subsection 94(2.1) of the act. It's not about section 87.4, as has been put on here.
The only thing we can do is talk about...it's fine to say “subject to section 87.4”, but it's all about dealing with subsection 94(2.1) of the act. That is what the language is about. It's not about proposed section 87.6, as it is here.