I definitely want to continue with a conversation around the motion.
I just want to reiterate what I was saying yesterday. I think, as we've heard through all of the discussion here, there are many, many flaws in this bill. There are flaws right from the standpoint of even dealing with this situation on an ad hoc basis through a private member's bill, right from the starting point, and then moving to the issues around the lack of an essential services provision within the bill. There are the problems with translation from French and English, particularly in that proposed subsection (2.4), where it's really obvious that they're not referring to the same thing in French and English. It's clear even from what the legislative clerk was saying yesterday that there are things wrong with this bill that we couldn't possibly amend and follow the rules of committee.
I just think it's important. And there is a second motion, which will follow this one, to take a more reasonable approach in a more consultative process, the way labour legislation should be modified. I think it's important that we continue to consider this motion. I'd like to hear some more thoughts, after maybe an evening of thought from the other side, as to their feelings on this.