On a point of order, I'd like some clarification. In terms of the motion that we left at the end of the last meeting, can someone explain to me why that wouldn't still be on the table?
On February 14th, 2007. See this statement in context.
On February 14th, 2007. See this statement in context.
February 14th, 2007 / 3:55 p.m.
Conservative
Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB
On a point of order, I'd like some clarification. In terms of the motion that we left at the end of the last meeting, can someone explain to me why that wouldn't still be on the table?
See context to find out what was said next.