Back to my question about normal practice, is this normal practice? Are there other places in the Labour Code where we have the same clause in two different places? Is this a normal way of amending legislation? You can maybe answer that.
Secondly, the question we've had, with specific examples, throughout our committee meetings—and I'm wondering if this addresses that—is does this change the fact that telecommunications, for example, in the past has been ruled not to be covered under the current section 87.4? Does this change that? In the case of a telecommunications strike or lockout, or work stoppage of some sort, would 911 services be protected under this legislation? What's the history?