So am I misreading proposed subsection 66(2.01), which says, "Interest payable under this Part constitutes a debt due to Her Majesty..."?
On February 20th, 2007. See this statement in context.
On February 20th, 2007. See this statement in context.
February 20th, 2007 / 4:20 p.m.
NDP
Chris Charlton NDP Hamilton Mountain, ON
So am I misreading proposed subsection 66(2.01), which says, "Interest payable under this Part constitutes a debt due to Her Majesty..."?
See context to find out what was said next.