The only comment I can make is yes, international comparisons are always difficult, whether we're talking about the incidence of low income, poverty among children, or whatever.
Still, the chart I distributed is based on an income study by Luxembourg, and so on, and the expenditures as a percentage of GDP are done. It was calculated by the OECD, and so on. So it's always difficult. But the fact remains that in many international analyses, whether it's OECD or the IMF, when they're talking generally—not in individual cases, as I understand there are always some hardship cases in some situations—Canada's reputation in terms of a retirement income system is absolutely excellent, not only as I've said in terms of protecting low-income seniors, but in terms of affordability, that balance between the two.
Also, with the reforms to the Canada Pension Plan we have alluded to, we are one of the very few countries that has tried to address this issue and put the plan on sound financial footing.
If I may, it's not a pay-as-you-go plan any more; it's a partial funding plan. We still have a way to go, but it's a partial funding plan for the Canada Pension Plan.