So under this act, with the amendment, all people who have been residents in Canada for less than ten years are treated equally now. We don't differentiate between them.
Ultimately, I don't think we want to go down the road of having two different people who've been in the country for three years, one who's a permanent resident and one who's a citizen, treated differently, such that the citizen gets the benefits and the resident doesn't. That leads to a whole question of motivation of citizenship at that point, in a sense, right? You don't want someone becoming a Canadian citizen simply because they get the benefits of the GIS or whatever the case may be. There are all sorts of great reasons that people become Canadian citizens. I think we want to be consistent, and I think residency is what we're talking about here.
Ms. Charlton looks like she may have....