To answer your first question, you must know that a private member's bill may not be a money bill, so this is not a money bill. It's a private member's bill. That's number one.
Number two, we could have a talk about social policy. Federalism is not a perfect instrument. I believe there are many things that you're confused about from your remarks. No, I'm not concerned that it will serve to freeze or cut child care spending; I think the purpose of the bill is to shape the federal money that's now being spent.
Are those your two questions? The rest wasn't a question.
I don't believe that the bill has.... The bill is not about freezing policy, but about shaping it.