You said it was flawed because it was not consistent with the provisions of the social union framework agreement, as I understand it. Did you have a second point, or was that it?
On May 8th, 2007. See this statement in context.
On May 8th, 2007. See this statement in context.
Prof. Harvey Lazar
You said it was flawed because it was not consistent with the provisions of the social union framework agreement, as I understand it. Did you have a second point, or was that it?
See context to find out what was said next.