You said it was flawed because it was not consistent with the provisions of the social union framework agreement, as I understand it. Did you have a second point, or was that it?
On May 8th, 2007. See this statement in context.
On May 8th, 2007. See this statement in context.
May 8th, 2007 / 11:40 a.m.
Prof. Harvey Lazar
You said it was flawed because it was not consistent with the provisions of the social union framework agreement, as I understand it. Did you have a second point, or was that it?
See context to find out what was said next.