Okay, and of course, making sure that we're not breaking any privacy rule, because I remember seeing it.
Mr. Chair, I don't know whether this would be out of order or not. Aside from getting the list—which makes sense, because certainly it's public anyway for a member of Parliament to receive it, and I don't see there is any reason for it not to be—I'm just wondering whether Mr. Savage would consider another aspect.
Since it's the first time that a grid system is being used—which I think is a good way to determine, by points and by merits, and all that; it's a good idea—has the department explored establishing an appeal process? I have seen that there are occasional mistakes, not because of the fault of anyone, but sometimes there is miscommunication.
I don't know whether an appeal process is possible. It may not connect with getting the information out, which I support anyway. I see that we don't really have department staff here, but if we're discussing this issue, could we think about having an appeal process, which really would help the situation right now?