So it's all of those.
Does this suggest to you that there's a very strong need for review of these criteria and the way they're applied? If groups—for example, in the case of autism, a soccer club that offers jobs for at risk kids; the Autism Society; students who need it the most, but face certain barriers; or one group here that didn't get funding, an amateur aquatic club.... That suggests to me that there's either a problem with the criteria or with the way they're applied, if all these kinds of groups did not receive funding, and that maybe the funding package was inadequate the first time and therefore the cutting of the overall budget was inappropriate. It has to be one or the other.