On the denials question, there is a difference between Service Canada and the department's sharing of information with a member of Parliament in the kind of dynamic that you described, and our tabling information publicly. Members of Parliament have different protections under the Privacy Act from what would be the case if we were to make the information public.
What I was trying to underline in my response--and perhaps I wasn't sufficiently clear, and I apologize if that's the case--was that for us to go and provide you with a list of organizations that did not receive funding in 2006.... First of all, it wouldn't be our practice to publish that kind of a list. That was the first point I was trying to make.
If we were to do that and publish that kind of a list in response to the committee, we would have to go through the list against privacy considerations. For example, we would not be able to release the name of a sole proprietorship. We'd have to go through the list item by item. There are probably about 10,000—