For consistency, we want to see what the department makes public, so we need all of the lists they usually make public. Perhaps what the members received before was not the same sort of list that is made public. I think to have consistency in what we're looking at and in comparing the data....
This is the whole problem: we're always comparing it with an old program. If we're really going to compare it with an old program, we need all of the information. To just study a new list and start going through a new list doesn't make any sense, when it's a brand new program. I think we have to have some sort of consistency.