I don't have a real problem with the amendment, but talk about inconsistency. Ms. Yelich says we can't make this so complicated; these guys are so busy. We don't have the information, and it's hard to get it, for 2006. Now we want to go back to 2004? I think all that's going to do is delay.
I don't have any problem saying we want this information on this amendment by June 12, and the rest of the information as soon as they can make it available. But anything that delays this information.... I support Ms. Yelich on this one thing: let's not make it too cumbersome for the department. This is the important information that we need.