Okay. I just want to get two more quick questions in.
You say it's the first time there's been a guide put together. How did organizations know what to say to prove that they were giving quality work experience in previous years?
Second, I understand that Mr. Savage, in a press release yesterday, said that he wanted to know the reasons why unsuccessful applicants were denied funding. This program was administered over the last ten years, and I'd be interested in knowing if that was something that was given every year.
Also, when MPs decided, did MPs provide the department, which had the ability to disburse, with why they picked and chose organizations, what the reasoning was? You know, in the interests of parity, I'm sure Mr. Savage would have done that and provided information on why he rejected applicants.