Thank you.
Ms. Yelich made a good point, which I'm not sure was fully observed by everyone. In her previous comments she said the information that's going to take the longest to acquire and put together is from this year. They already have the information for previous years. It was sent out to individual MPs. So if we're worried about a date and getting previous years--delaying information that Mr. Savage so dearly wants--that's not a problem. The information is already there. This will not delay it. This will only provide context.
So if you're against context, don't worry about Mr. Lake's motion; oppose it. But your amendment doesn't specify that it's at the same time, and that's what we want. We want it at the same time so there's context. We can move through this very quickly. It's ready now and this will not delay it. So I don't know why we're saying September 1, or something like that.