I don't believe we looked at individual cases per se and how they could be dealt with. We did raise our concern about identity theft and the importance of the social insurance number, and that it might affect government policy on the use of the social insurance number. Government policy, as we said--they restated it in 2002--was that it's simply a file identifier. If you treat it as a file identifier you will put in much different procedures to verify its integrity than if you treat it as a number that could be used by the private sector, for example, for a whole lot of other reasons.
The level of protection and effort you put in the system to ensure the identity of the person varies. In 2002, government reaffirmed they'd treated it as a file identifier. That may have changed since then, and that is obviously an issue we will be looking at.