No, Mr. Savage, that's a characterization based on your political perspective of what I said, which is fair enough, because of course your business is very similar to mine.
Basically what I would say is this. If they have an opportunity to work elsewhere--and we have to remember now that we're not talking 15 or 20 years ago when, in order to get a job you had to move from River Bourgeois to Edmonton. We're talking about moving from River Bourgeois perhaps to Sydney or from Sydney perhaps to Halifax. So we're not talking about major disruptions in life and limb.
That being said, if industries and people in those communities want to stay there and want to have a system of employment insurance, all we're saying is that they should pay a little bit extra. If you want to have a system where you're being paid to be able to work six or eight or ten weeks of the year and stay the rest of the time in the community that you've come to love and are refusing to move from, then maybe we should be taking a look at whether or not your employer and you should be paying an additional premium for that.