The comment is that I want to ensure that this does set a precedent, that in a similar circumstance, regardless of the point of view of the witness, we'll see this exact same result.
I'm prepared to give unanimous consent. I think it's reasonable. What I don't want to see are political games being played the next time a witness comes forward and wants to do the same thing, because I've seen it happen the other way, where unanimous consent has been denied on the other side. I don't want to see that happen.
So I expect that this will set a precedent in a similar circumstance next time. That's all I'm saying.