Yes. To clarify, I don't believe that for Bill C-269 in particular officials were asked to provide costs. But we were here in 2004, and at that point in time there were five or six questions that the committee posed, and one of them related to the 360-hour entrance requirement.
It's important to recognize that basically the numbers we have for you today are a much more comprehensive and detailed costing than we had in 2004. In 2004, unfortunately we only had about two days to prepare before answering the committee's questions, and the approach we had to take at that point.... There was also a lot less detail than we have in the currently proposed bill, in terms of what those parameters would be.
The numbers we brought forward for the 360 hours at that point, as I believe was mentioned by officials at the time, were minimum estimates and were preliminary estimates. I think we said that if we were given more time, we would be able to address those more comprehensively.
So the higher numbers I have for you today reflect the fact that, as I mentioned, we've broken out the costing for each one of those changes; that's with the benefit of time we've had over the last three years.