Very well.
There was a period of liability followed by a period of assets, and then there was a surplus in the fund. Was the amount of $54 billion higher than the amount of the previous liability, or was there some exaggeration?
On May 1st, 2008. See this statement in context.
Conservative
Jacques Gourde Conservative Lotbinière—Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, QC
Very well.
There was a period of liability followed by a period of assets, and then there was a surplus in the fund. Was the amount of $54 billion higher than the amount of the previous liability, or was there some exaggeration?
See context to find out what was said next.