I thought you made an interesting point about the calendar year, which sort of confuses figures as well. This will create a little more understanding of surpluses or deficits, because it will be their own calendar year and they won't be working with another calendar year.
Did I read that or understand that right, that that confuses things more? When Mr. Savage asked about this so-called surplus that year, it really wasn't accurate, because the EI runs in a different calendar year. Is that fair to say?
The other thing I thought was really interesting is that it doesn't matter, the CRF will always back it up if there is.... We don't have to worry. I think that is a concern, that this $2 billion is there, and once it has gone, the poor employees will not have the benefits there. But it's up to the board, and the board will decide if the benefits are.... Parliament will decide if benefits are expanded, and of course Revenue Canada will always cover it. Am I right?
Would you like to reiterate?