I would like to make one final comment about the surpluses. I understand that the Supreme Court of Canada will have to make a ruling on that issue quite soon. So we should refer to the Supreme Court, and see what its decision will be. In any case, I will be watching this judgment with a great deal of interest.
Parity on the board of directors could be a desirable model. However, some aspects could be improved. For example, the president of some parity organizations, who is an official appointed by the government, is also the chair of the board; this individual has two responsibilities. That is how it works at the CSST. Modern governance models suggest that it is preferable to have different people in the position of president and chair of the board of directors.
In other words, the models used in Quebec could be copied, but we could perhaps improve on them, as I have just described.