We would be very supportive of such a measure. We have for a long time asked that insurance be insurance and social programs be social programs. This way, there can be legitimate political debate about how generous you want your social programs to be. Different governments could have different approaches. If you have an insurance mechanism, it has a certain logic, a certain purpose. It has a certain way of being managed. Ideally, it would be structured that way. When you mix them together, it can become confusing and difficult. So if the government or some parliamentarian wanted to go that route, we would be supportive.
On May 6th, 2008. See this statement in context.