When we had the premium rate-setting mechanism, the view was being expressed, from the employer side as well, that there was a need to expand those active measures, given skill shortages, etc.
One concern about this new mechanism goes back to Ms. Sgro's point: if we were to enter into a recession, there would be a temptation on the part of the government to underspend or reduce the allocation for active measures. It's not driven by statute. Essentially, the government determines it. It's discretionary. Parts of it are self-generating, such as funds for apprenticeship. There is a legitimate concern that if we entered a recession the part not driven by statute would be reduced.