I want to understand your remarks, because my opinion will be based on your testimony.
You said that your organization and the government at the time took part in an effort to consider the amendments made to employment insurance in 1996. You also said that 44% of the fund is currently being used by the employment insurance plan; the rest goes elsewhere. And yet you said that nothing has changed since 1996.
It seems to me that something major has changed: a surplus of $54 billion was generated as a result of the cuts made to the employment insurance plan, and the fund's contribution to support people who lose their jobs was lowered to 44%. Perhaps I misunderstood, but you said that nothing had changed since 1996. Something has changed, but for the worse.