I would respectfully disagree and suggest to you that setting the rates is something that will require some sensitivity in terms of who can afford to pay what. And in terms of looking at how the fund will grow or not grow, depending on investments, I find it a little bit--I hate to use this word--“arrogant” to suggest that workers, for example, may not have some interest in where that money might be invested so that it might contribute and make sure that the fund stays healthy.
I understand that your ministry will take care of the benefits side of things, but the benefits side of things will be paid for by what's in the account, isn't that right? So I would think there would be certainly a very direct and important interest, on behalf of employees across the country, in how that fund is actually built up and managed.