I'm sorry if I misunderstood your question. I wasn't trying to deliberately misunderstand it.
I agree with you entirely. It is obviously far better to help people to help themselves than to give them some kind of minimum income support every week. However, these policies can often be very expensive. It can often be cheaper to give income support every week, at least in the short term. So governments often don't want to invest the money it would require sometimes to help people to help themselves. But even once you have done that--and to a certain extent I think the U.K. government has been pursuing a lot of those kinds of active labour market policies--a significant number of people are still caring for and responsible for disabled adults or disabled children. They really do need income support to have an adequate standard of living, because that care and work really does have to be done.