On a point of order, now that there's a timeline attached, it's not necessarily a superceding motion, right? So with the condition, it is debatable.
On January 31st, 2008. See this statement in context.
On January 31st, 2008. See this statement in context.
January 31st, 2008 / 9:40 a.m.
Conservative
Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB
On a point of order, now that there's a timeline attached, it's not necessarily a superceding motion, right? So with the condition, it is debatable.
See context to find out what was said next.