Yes, I just want to know from Mr. Komarnicki what problem he's trying to solve with this motion. I mean, you keep referencing how this worked at some other committee. We didn't have a problem at this committee with it. I don't remember there being any kind of a kerfuffle over the timing of when a motion was put in or sent out or whatever. We all knew it took two days. It was 48 hours from when we submitted it, and we expected it would come up at the next committee meeting. So I don't know what problem we're trying to solve with this amendment and why we would do that when we haven't had any difficulties on this issue.
We may be anticipating difficulties, but we've been able to resolve those on this committee. We've had our differences and our very intense and heated debates over various things, but at the end of the day we have worked them out.
Maybe Mr. Komarnicki is bringing forward problems of other committees that really didn't happen at this committee. I think that would be unfortunate. I think we have a unique and very positive history here. We have a culture of working together. I don't think we want to be solving the problems of other committees by moving amendments that really aren't necessary.