We measure the quality end of it in terms of health and safety or the physical protection of the child.
The second point I'd make on your point about women in the workforce is that, absolutely, that development is the same everywhere across the western world. I don't think that's a particular issue. My only point about this is that I hope people get away from what I call the rather elitist discussion about women in the workforce that I find often takes place--and I've had a few arguments about this--and is always cast in the eye of careers. Now, the honest truth is, most women in the workforce, whether we like it or not, work because they need the money. It's a job.
As I said to somebody the other day, if you're eviscerating chickens on an assembly line in Bradford, I defy anybody to tell me that's a career and that you're interested in your career patterns at the chicken-eviscerating factory. The fact is, it's a job, and you're probably doing it because, if there are two of you, there's not enough money in the family, or you're by yourself and you have to get a job to try to get some extra money, etc. That's a job. The job is driven by money. Many of these women, if they had the opportunity, would actually like to be doing some of that nurturing work themselves, but they can't afford to because there's not enough money around, so they're offloading it.
The balance in looking at this is to say that in the early years, do we actually spend our time driving people out to work because there's a financial issue here? Have we looked at that? Are you looking at this and the balance of saying, well, if you were given the choice and it was a balanced decision, where would you go with this?