Thank you, Mr. Chair. I appreciate the question and I will try to keep it brief.
You mentioned the repatriation. I'm sure we could talk for an hour and a half about the repatriation and the term they use when they've taken individuals from institutions with no preplanning and put them into the community. Many of the issues we're talking about now could have been resolved if there had been a lot of preplanning.
We've talked a lot about “housing first”, and one of the things that I think is very clear that I would like to hear you explain is.... It's great when you get a roof over your head. That's an important piece in reducing homelessness and addressing mental illness. But as soon as they get a roof over their head, you can't wash your hands of the individual. There are so many responsibilities in becoming a tenant, and with mental health, all of a sudden you have to worry about paying all of your bills. The “housing first” strategy can't just be putting a roof over their heads. There have to be so many other support services in place. Is that correct?