You're right, a lot of the issues we work on actually cross among the different advisory committees, and we actually have a mechanism for getting more than one advisory committee together collectively to do that.
Let me just make one other comment about the role of the federal government, because one of our approaches to the homelessness issue was to take the federal government's money and lever it, that is to say, to use it to get other people to come to the table with cash. We've actually managed to do that. We're running some 25% ahead of the amount of federal money we received, through a variety of ways. We have the provincial governments, we have the regional health authorities, and we have the private sector coming to the table.
You mentioned the Vancouver example. Just as an interesting illustration, the private sector in Vancouver—just as the private sector is doing in Montreal, Toronto, Calgary, and other places—is paying for supportive housing for a group of people for whom we will then pay their mental health services. Since we don't have to pay for their housing, we're able to treat a lot more people.
This is an interesting area, and the nature of the questions around the table absolutely prove that it's a non-partisan issue. It's a non-partisan issue in the bigger sense that everybody out there seems to be willing to put aside the traditional jurisdictional lines and say, we have a problem and let's all pitch in and help.
That's one of the very encouraging things about this. There are people from the private sector, governments, and a variety of services who all seem willing to say, “We won't do the usual business of operating only in our own square box; we're willing to look more broadly.”