I think it did. It gets to the nature of the work you do.
Traditionally the way we've developed cities, it seems to me, has entrenched poverty in that we put what has traditionally been called the affordable housing, the low-income housing, all in one area, and then we forget about it, dust our hands off and say we've taken care of that. Then we're surprised that people aren't as proud of that community as they might be, or that crime would be generated in that community.
We heard last night at the forum that some of us had a chance to go to about something I was not aware of--others may have been. In Boston, Mayor Thomas Menino led a plan that 10% of any new condominiums had to be for, as I understood it, low-income housing, which means that you're integrating people who may be from different financial backgrounds, but they have a chance to work together, live together, understand each other, without the stigma of being in an affordable housing area.
I know that in Dartmouth North, Paul, people have been irritated about development. They're proud of the community they have, but they haven't had the opportunity to express it. I just wonder if any of you have a thought about the approach to housing that we've had versus how we should do it.