I certainly wish you success, that's for sure.
The other thing we've heard, and I think you may be part of the way on this, is that many times federal and provincial programs are designed, there are calls for proposals, and that gets a number of people competing for the same set of funds and trying to build into a particular fund, whether it addresses the greatest need on the ground or not. They find that there's a degree of competition and they spend a lot of time making applications for funding, trying to get the grants that are available, and tailoring their operation to that end.
The sense I get is that what the people on the front lines would like to see is their understanding of what needs to happen, their understanding of the needs, being funnelled up to the various levels of government, to have the programs then tailored back to them, with some sort of systemic process in place to ensure that this happens on an ongoing basis.
What you're suggesting is to get to a certain point and then implement, but this thing carries on and continues, and programs may need to be redeveloped and realigned based on regional needs, on individual needs, and on the things that are happening.
What do you propose in terms of structural systemic things that can be put in place to ensure that these things come about?