When we fill out the applications, it can take us one or two months to fill out the year-end report that is suppose to contain all the recommendations and account for everything that happened during the year.
Some of the questions are very specific. For example, we are asked how many children in the group are able to brush their teeth, how many cannot and why they cannot. It seems to me that the questions could be much more general, not so specific. For example, one question might be how many children aged two to three are able to do one particular activity. The questions should be less specific.
Then, when we send in the report, the person who is in charge of our file contacts us to review the various points raised within the report. For example, she will ask us exactly what we meant by one particular remark, because she is not sure how to interpret our figures. Eventually it all becomes very confusing, and we get the impression that they think we've done something wrong, but really, it's just a matter of how to interpret our activities.
Perhaps they should trust us more—I don't like the word—or they could be more flexible with—