Thank you, Mr. Chair.
The presentation you made seemed to me to be extremely complete and well-organized.
But I would like to go into a little more detail on some of the points you raised. In terms of the national strategy, I know for a fact that the use of the word “national“, in the Canadian context, is a significant obstacle. Given the federal-provincial agreements that are to come, could you tell us how it will be possible to avoid obstacles like that in the minds of some provincial and territorial governments?
So we are talking about a national strategy, a federal-provincial agreement on education as part of the fight against poverty. You said that accountability can not always be measured or expressed in precise numbers. But I feel that accountability should be a significant element of an ideal agreement. That has not always been the case. I would like to hear your comments on that.
I would also like you, if possible, to include the question of legal challenges and the assistance that the government could provide. I think that Ms. Russell in particular indirectly alluded to it in her presentation. If possible, I would like both your answer and the national strategy to deal with the issue.
The question is open to anyone who wants to answer.