I understand that, and I appreciate your remarks, but I want to get on the record the fact that.... You know these stories too. I'm still troubled with the fact that I hear people coming to you after grade 12. It's one thing, as you say, when people lose these skills at a point because they may be off doing some very manual things through most of their time. But it's still really troubling to me, because I so much appreciated...I developed my love for learning through a low-level, poverty income kind of background, but through the school system. I'm troubled that people can be passed all the way through grade 12 and not have it. I think that's a basic, foundational thing that pre-empted—prevented, if you will.... And of course we have to do the other, beyond that.
What are the things, along that line, beyond having people come back to work at skills in literacy that they never had to any great degree, or to pick them up again because they have lost the skills over time...? We can have our literacy centres, in my city of Saskatoon and elsewhere, and I'm intrigued with what I think Sherry said. Is there a great push for this—having it more in the food banks, the health clinics, the counselling? Certainly our government is pushing within the job retraining to have more of it. I think Margaret acknowledged that a bit here too. Do you sense that this is happening, that this is the point of contact? I think it's a great idea. Why haven't we been doing it since a long time ago?