No, I'm saying that based on research, if we transfer a lump sum of money to a family and look at certain outcomes--for example, children's health or children's poverty--what has been found is that transferring just that amount of cash has little impact on their health or on other outcomes, such as educational attainment.
What I am trying to say is that alongside income transfers, we should be placing most of the emphasis on in-kind transfers. Along with those cash transfers, we should be having in-kind transfers, but with the focus on the latter, because those have been shown to be more effective in influencing children's outcomes, such as health and educational attainment.