I'll try to start by addressing your first question about the culture of hope. I'm not sure who it was that did say that. One comment I would make on that is I think a critical piece of this--and this is referenced in the campaign that Karri had put forward--and that is public attitudes towards poverty. One thing I didn't say in my last comments is that I do think it's true that one of the reasons we haven't seen substantial change in poverty rates over the last number of years is that it hasn't been a government priority, it hasn't been a political priority, it hasn't been a public priority. In saying a culture of hope, I think one of the critical issues, and something the federal government may have a role in, is starting to change negative attitudes towards poverty. To put it bluntly, we need to change attitudes towards poor people. There's a culture of blame, a culture of difference, etc.
Just to go back to this question of who should be doing what and what jurisdiction, federal leadership could play a part. We do have, frankly, uneven attitudes across the country about what is the responsibility of government in taking care of the people. That's one place where there could be a role for the federal government in shifting public attitudes.