As I explained, there were applications the first time around that would have gone through and met mandatory requirements, then as we looked at them and scored them against the criteria around reduction of barriers, around community support, etc., they may indeed have achieved a certain score, but there were so many that were better than them that they were the ones that got the financial support.
We can't prioritize before we gather applications and begin to assess them, know whether or not something that didn't get funded last time won't get funded this time. It is possible.