No, there was not. We'd normally do that, but this was recognition that the benefits are available by attachment to the workforce, by length of employment, and by amount of EI claims. There was recognition in designing it when we said that they must have participated in seven out of the last 10 years. There may have been women who took time off to have children, for example.
That's why we made two conditions. First, it allowed that time, that extra three-year period, to be out of the workforce for any reason. Secondly, we made sure that when we say they claim benefits for no more than 35 weeks, that's only regular benefits, not special benefits, and 90% of special benefits are used by women.